Napoleon Series Archive 2011

Re: Development of field artillery in the XVIII Ce

Dear Digby
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner as I have been very ill with infected roots, ear infection etc.

I was hoping that it would be more enlightening. Is it worth continuing with this as your e-mails and comments are probably enough. It was typical of the nonsense exchanged about Valliere and Gribeauval even today.
Stephen

Messages In This Thread

Development of field artillery in the XVIII Centur
Re: Development of field artillery in the XVIII Ce
Re: Development of field artillery in the XVIII Ce
Re: Development of field artillery in the XVIII Ce
Re: Development of field artillery in the XVIII Ce
Re: Development of field artillery in the XVIII Ce
Re: Development of field artillery in the XVIII Ce
Re: Development of field artillery in the XVIII Ce
Re: Development of field artillery in the XVIII Ce
ZfHuUk: 1957 & 1958 issues.
Re: Development of field artillery in the XVIII Ce
Part 1: ZfHuUK Nr. 154, pp 69-74.
Part 2: ZfHuUK Nr. 155, pp 85-89.
Part 3: ZfHuUK Nr. 156, pp 116-118.
Part 4: ZfHuUK Nr. 157, pp 2-4
Re: Development of field artillery in the XVIII Ce
Re: Development of field artillery in the XVIII Ce
Re: Development of field artillery in the XVIII Ce
Re: Development of field artillery in the XVIII Ce
Re: Development of field artillery in the XVIII Ce
Direction.
Re: Development of field artillery in the XVIII Ce
Re: Development of field artillery in the XVIII Ce *LINK*
Re: Development of field artillery in the XVIII Ce