Titeux, though useful in presenting facts, I find off-putting in his interpretation of the facts. In my view his article reads like a legal brief for Bernadotte’s defense, rather than a dispassionate weighing of the facts.

On the contrary, Titeux is weighting the facts and only the facts and not the myths and the slander from which the Prince de Ponte Corvo is still suffering - as well as his numerous charcter assasinations.
I find it very strange that a lot of testimoney of Bernadotte's good heart are completly ignored, read for example what Vigo-Rousillon (then a mere captain) has to say about him.