No, it isn't. The point is that replacing loyal officers who had fought for France with those who had not further alienated the army against the Bourbons which was not a wise move on the Bourbons part. And the opinions of those who had served against France are irrelevant on that point. The bottom line is that the Bourbons made a hash of ruling France in 1814-1815 and they refused to honor the provisions of the Treaty of Fontainebleu which brought Napoleon back.